+1, Hudson is awesome! :) On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Jim Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1Agree to use Hudson. > > 2009/1/15 Tony Wu <[email protected]> > > > +1 > > > > hudson is cool. > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Jack Cai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 too. > > > > > > -Jack > > > > > > 2009/1/15 chunrong lai <[email protected]> > > > > > >> +1. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Sean Qiu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 > > >> > Would we deploy a copy of BTI there? That may be helpful. > > >> > > > >> > 2009/1/14 Tim Ellison <[email protected]> > > >> > > > >> > > As I was catching up on e-mails, and reading the discussion > between > > >> > > Chunrong and Nathan about EUT testing, it struck me that it might > be > > >> > > helpful if we had a shared build server hosted at the ASF. > > >> > > > > >> > > There are a number of machines running Hudson, so I believe we > could > > >> get > > >> > > a slot on a Linux machine to build and test Harmony in a way that > is > > >> > > more visible to the development group than the current community > > builds > > >> > > and alerts list. > > >> > > > > >> > > Having community builds is still good, since the heterogeneity > means > > we > > >> > > get to hear about problems before they get out of hand, e.g. the > ASF > > >> > > doesn't run any Windows boxes AFAIK. > > >> > > > > >> > > What do you think? Should I ask infra to get a Harmony slot on > the > > >> > > Hudson build machine? We would have to give some indication of > > >> > > predicted load and size of artifacts we would expect to use. > > >> > > > > >> > > Regards, > > >> > > Tim > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Best Regards > > >> > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu > > >> > > > >> > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tony Wu > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Jim, Jun Jie Yu > > China Software Development Lab, IBM >
