+1 hudson is cool.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Jack Cai <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 too. > > -Jack > > 2009/1/15 chunrong lai <[email protected]> > >> +1. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Sean Qiu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > Would we deploy a copy of BTI there? That may be helpful. >> > >> > 2009/1/14 Tim Ellison <[email protected]> >> > >> > > As I was catching up on e-mails, and reading the discussion between >> > > Chunrong and Nathan about EUT testing, it struck me that it might be >> > > helpful if we had a shared build server hosted at the ASF. >> > > >> > > There are a number of machines running Hudson, so I believe we could >> get >> > > a slot on a Linux machine to build and test Harmony in a way that is >> > > more visible to the development group than the current community builds >> > > and alerts list. >> > > >> > > Having community builds is still good, since the heterogeneity means we >> > > get to hear about problems before they get out of hand, e.g. the ASF >> > > doesn't run any Windows boxes AFAIK. >> > > >> > > What do you think? Should I ask infra to get a Harmony slot on the >> > > Hudson build machine? We would have to give some indication of >> > > predicted load and size of artifacts we would expect to use. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Tim >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best Regards >> > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu >> > >> > China Software Development Lab, IBM >> > >> > -- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM
