+1Agree to use Hudson. 2009/1/15 Tony Wu <[email protected]>
> +1 > > hudson is cool. > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Jack Cai <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 too. > > > > -Jack > > > > 2009/1/15 chunrong lai <[email protected]> > > > >> +1. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Sean Qiu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > Would we deploy a copy of BTI there? That may be helpful. > >> > > >> > 2009/1/14 Tim Ellison <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > > As I was catching up on e-mails, and reading the discussion between > >> > > Chunrong and Nathan about EUT testing, it struck me that it might be > >> > > helpful if we had a shared build server hosted at the ASF. > >> > > > >> > > There are a number of machines running Hudson, so I believe we could > >> get > >> > > a slot on a Linux machine to build and test Harmony in a way that is > >> > > more visible to the development group than the current community > builds > >> > > and alerts list. > >> > > > >> > > Having community builds is still good, since the heterogeneity means > we > >> > > get to hear about problems before they get out of hand, e.g. the ASF > >> > > doesn't run any Windows boxes AFAIK. > >> > > > >> > > What do you think? Should I ask infra to get a Harmony slot on the > >> > > Hudson build machine? We would have to give some indication of > >> > > predicted load and size of artifacts we would expect to use. > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Tim > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Best Regards > >> > Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu > >> > > >> > China Software Development Lab, IBM > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > Tony Wu > China Software Development Lab, IBM > -- Best Regards, Jim, Jun Jie Yu China Software Development Lab, IBM
