It's the first bullet under Phase I. Can you mention HBASE-5306 there ?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > What's the role of HBASE-5306 in your proposal ? > > Thanks > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I posted the proposal on wiki: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseWireCompatibility >> >> Thanks, >> Jimmy >> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Can you post on wiki ? >> > >> > Attachment stripped. >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > As HBase installation base is getting bigger, we are ready to work on >> the >> > > wire compatibility issue. >> > > The goal is to make HBase easier for operators to upgrade, while it is >> > > also easier for developers to >> > > enhance, re-architect if necessary. >> > > >> > > The attached is a proposal we came up. We'd like to start with two >> > phases: >> > > >> > > Phase 1: Compatibility between client applications and HBase clusters >> > > Phase 2: HBase cluster rolling upgrade within same major version >> > > >> > > Could you please review? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Jimmy >> > > >> > >> > >
