Sure. I will add that. To me, HBASE-5306 is more about the RPC engine. It can evolve in parallel since the current HBase RPC can support PB already due to HADOOP-7379<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > It's the first bullet under Phase I. > > Can you mention HBASE-5306 there ? > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What's the role of HBASE-5306 in your proposal ? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I posted the proposal on wiki: > >> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseWireCompatibility > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jimmy > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Can you post on wiki ? > >> > > >> > Attachment stripped. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hello, > >> > > > >> > > As HBase installation base is getting bigger, we are ready to work > on > >> the > >> > > wire compatibility issue. > >> > > The goal is to make HBase easier for operators to upgrade, while it > is > >> > > also easier for developers to > >> > > enhance, re-architect if necessary. > >> > > > >> > > The attached is a proposal we came up. We'd like to start with two > >> > phases: > >> > > > >> > > Phase 1: Compatibility between client applications and HBase > clusters > >> > > Phase 2: HBase cluster rolling upgrade within same major version > >> > > > >> > > Could you please review? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Jimmy > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
