HADOOP-7379 was marked resolved for 0.23 Does this imply that hadoop 0.23 or above must be used ? If so, we'd better state that on the wiki.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure. I will add that. To me, HBASE-5306 is more about the RPC engine. > It can evolve in parallel since the current HBase RPC > can support PB already due to > HADOOP-7379<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's the first bullet under Phase I. > > > > Can you mention HBASE-5306 there ? > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What's the role of HBASE-5306 in your proposal ? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I posted the proposal on wiki: > > >> > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseWireCompatibility > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Jimmy > > >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Can you post on wiki ? > > >> > > > >> > Attachment stripped. > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jimmy Xiang <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hello, > > >> > > > > >> > > As HBase installation base is getting bigger, we are ready to work > > on > > >> the > > >> > > wire compatibility issue. > > >> > > The goal is to make HBase easier for operators to upgrade, while > it > > is > > >> > > also easier for developers to > > >> > > enhance, re-architect if necessary. > > >> > > > > >> > > The attached is a proposal we came up. We'd like to start with > two > > >> > phases: > > >> > > > > >> > > Phase 1: Compatibility between client applications and HBase > > clusters > > >> > > Phase 2: HBase cluster rolling upgrade within same major version > > >> > > > > >> > > Could you please review? > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Jimmy > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
