+1 Checked the hash Checked the tar layout. Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine. > > Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip of the > branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big linked list > test worked). > > TSDB seems to work fine against this RC. > > I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is too > occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal rig > running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been passing green > running IT tests on a small cluster over hours. > > St.Ack > > > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download at > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven artifacts are > also > > available in the temporary repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016 > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 > > > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time > (00:00 > > PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > >
