It's just the optimization that's (sometimes) broken, right? The scan still returns the correct results, no?
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > James: > HBASE-10850 is not just about SingleColumnValueFilter. See Anoop's comment: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10850?focusedCommentId=13958668&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13958668 > > The test case Fabien provided uses SingleColumnValueFilter but the defect > has deeper implication beyond making SingleColumnValueFilter unusable in > certain scenarios. > > I am find with giving the next RC a bit shorter voting period. > > Cheers > > >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, James Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it >> can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it >> seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these >> additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]? >> >> James >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time. >>> >>> Regards >>> Ram >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Understood, Andy. >>>> >>>> I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98 >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell < >> [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1 >>>> vote >>>>> and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take >>> the >>>>> time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file >>>>> blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1. >>>>> 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release. >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree with Anoop's assessment. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After analysing HBASE-10850 I think better we can fix this in >> 98.1 >>>>> release >>>>>>> itself. Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses >>> essential >>>>> CF >>>>>>> optimization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Considering those we need a new RC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Anoop- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 on the RC. >>>>>>>> Checked the signature. >>>>>>>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases. >>>>>>>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels. Everything >>>> looks >>>>>>>> fine. >>>>>>>> Compaction, flushes etc too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Ram >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark < >> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Checked the hash >>>>>>>>> Checked the tar layout. >>>>>>>>> Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a >> tip >>>> of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big >>>> linked >>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>> test worked). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is >>> too >>>>>>>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our >> internal >>>> rig >>>>>>>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been >>> passing >>>>>>>> green >>>>>>>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for >>>>>>>> download >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven >>> artifacts >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> also >>>>>>>>>>> available in the temporary repository >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight >> Pacific >>>> Time >>>>>>>>>> (00:00 >>>>>>>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as >>>> 0.98.1. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - >>>> Piet >>>>>>>>> Hein >>>>>>>>>>> (via Tom White) >>
