Understood, Andy. I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
Cheers On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote: > I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow. > > However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1 vote > and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take the > time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file > blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1. > 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release. > > > On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I agree with Anoop's assessment. > > > > Cheers > > > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> After analysing HBASE-10850 I think better we can fix this in 98.1 > release > >> itself. Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses essential > CF > >> optimization. > >> > >> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case, > >> > >> Considering those we need a new RC. > >> > >> -Anoop- > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 on the RC. > >>> Checked the signature. > >>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases. > >>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels. Everything looks > >>> fine. > >>> Compaction, flushes etc too. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Ram > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Checked the hash > >>>> Checked the tar layout. > >>>> Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip of > >>> the > >>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big linked > >>>> list > >>>>> test worked). > >>>>> > >>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC. > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is too > >>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal rig > >>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been passing > >>> green > >>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours. > >>>>> > >>>>> St.Ack > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected] > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for > >>> download > >>>> at > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven artifacts > >>> are > >>>>> also > >>>>>> available in the temporary repository > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time > >>>>> (00:00 > >>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Andy > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > >>>> Hein > >>>>>> (via Tom White) > >>> >
