I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow. However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1 vote and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take the time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1. 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Anoop's assessment. > > Cheers > >> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> After analysing HBASE-10850 I think better we can fix this in 98.1 release >> itself. Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses essential CF >> optimization. >> >> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case, >> >> Considering those we need a new RC. >> >> -Anoop- >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 on the RC. >>> Checked the signature. >>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases. >>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels. Everything looks >>> fine. >>> Compaction, flushes etc too. >>> >>> Regards >>> Ram >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Checked the hash >>>> Checked the tar layout. >>>> Played with a single node. Everything seemed good after ITBLL >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> The hash is good. Doc. and layout looks good. UI seems fine. >>>>> >>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip of >>> the >>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster. Seems to basically work (small big linked >>>> list >>>>> test worked). >>>>> >>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC. >>>>> >>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is too >>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal rig >>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been passing >>> green >>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours. >>>>> >>>>> St.Ack >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for >>> download >>>> at >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven artifacts >>> are >>>>> also >>>>>> available in the temporary repository >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016 >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>>>> >>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time >>>>> (00:00 >>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >>>> Hein >>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>
