I saw that too. Agree it is not a blocker.
Unit test suite is running. Cheers On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew, > > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of: > > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink' > > .... > > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me? > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix > > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation > > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's > > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for > > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have > > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but > > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at > > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and > > should be straightforward to assess. > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for > > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/ > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > > The issues resolved in this release are: > > > > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963 > > > > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table > > RPC is incorrect > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972 > > > > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release, > > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein (via Tom White) > > >
