That is an annoying Mac-ism. Normally I build on Linux boxen so this shouldn't happen again.
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andrew, > > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of: > > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink' > > .... > > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me? > >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix >> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation >> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's >> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for >> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have >> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but >> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at >> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and >> should be straightforward to assess. >> >> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for >> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven >> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/ >> >> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >> >> The issues resolved in this release are: >> >> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963 >> >> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table >> RPC is incorrect >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972 >> >> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release, >> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time >> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >> Hein (via Tom White) >>
