Yes, it is only in the src tarball. Apart from this all my checks are fine. Enis
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < [email protected]> wrote: > Did not get those errors on my side for the binaries: > jms@t430s:/tmp$ tar -xzf hbase-0.98.6.1-hadoop2-bin.tar.gz > jms@t430s:/tmp$ > > But got that on the src too. However, as you said, content seems to be > fine. > > I still think we should fix that. > > 2014-09-15 21:35 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>: > > > I saw that too. > > > > Agree it is not a blocker. > > > > Unit test suite is running. > > > > Cheers > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of: > > > > > > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink' > > > > > > .... > > > > > > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me? > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix > > > > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation > > > > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's > > > > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for > > > > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have > > > > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but > > > > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at > > > > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and > > > > should be straightforward to assess. > > > > > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for > > > > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and > Maven > > > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/ > > > > > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > > > > > > The issues resolved in this release are: > > > > > > > > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection > > attempts > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963 > > > > > > > > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table > > > > RPC is incorrect > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972 > > > > > > > > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch > release, > > > > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time > > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > > > Hein (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > >
