Wierd. I recompiled with the new JARs and all, it now it works. Sorry for
the spam. Running some tests.

JMS

2018-03-05 20:48 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>:

> Just curious, has something changed in the LoadBalancer?
>
> My own personal balancer was working fine with 2.0.0-b1 but doesn't seems
> to work anymore with 2.0.0-b2:
> 2018-03-05 20:33:55,073 ERROR [master/node2:60000] master.HMaster: Failed
> to become active master
> java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: clusterStatus
> at c.c.s.hbase.LoadBasedBalancer.initialize(LoadBasedBalancer.java:42)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.finishActiveMasterInitializati
> on(HMaster.java:869)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.startActiveMasterManager(
> HMaster.java:2020)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.run(HMaster.java:553)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>
> Has the visibility of the clusterStatus field from StochasticLoadBalancer
> changed between the 2 versions? I'm not good enough at GIT to be able to
> compare them :(
>
> JMS
>
>
> 2018-03-05 16:15 GMT-05:00 Umesh Agashe <[email protected]>:
>
>> Thanks Stack! Created HBASE-20135.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks  Umesh. File an issue though? Stuff Anoops comment in it. While
>> > 'harmless', it will scare users; we should fix it.
>> > Thanks for trying the RC,
>> > S
>> >
>> > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Umesh Agashe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes, I started hbase2 over hbase1 when I got the exception. I also
>> tried
>> > > running TestReplicationAdmin a couple of times and can not reliably
>> > > reproduce the problem.
>> > >
>> > > I am changing my vote to +1.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Umesh
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thank Umesh for giving it a run.
>> > > >
>> > > > Did you start the hbase2 over an hbase1 dataset. I've seen the
>> > exception
>> > > > you note when I've done this. The startup keeps going over this
>> > > exception,
>> > > > right? (IIRC, its a complaint reading a file written w/ hbase1... We
>> > fail
>> > > > to read in the bloom filter which is not the end-of-the-world).
>> > > >
>> > > > On the replication failures, you can reproduce reliably?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > St.Ack
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Umesh Agashe <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > -1 non-binding (concerns noted below)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > download src & bin tar ball                                   - OK
>> > > > > signatures & sums
>> - OK
>> > > > > build from source (openjdk version "1.8.0_151")  - OK
>> > > > > rat check
>> > >  -
>> > > > > OK
>> > > > > unit tests
>> > > >  -
>> > > > > NOT OK
>> > > > > start local instance from bin & CRUD from shell  - OK
>> > > > > LTT write, read1 million rows, 2 cols/row              - OK
>> > > > > Upgrade from 1.4.2
>>  - OK
>> > > > > check logs
>> > >  -
>> > > > > NOT OK
>> > > > >
>> > > > > NOTE:
>> > > > > * Error message in the log is concerning.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Found following exception logged multiple times (~11) in the log:
>> > > > > ERROR [StoreFileOpenerThread-test_cf-1]
>> > regionserver.StoreFileReader:
>> > > > > Error
>> > > > > reading bloom filter meta for GENERAL_BLOOM_META -- proceeding
>> > without
>> > > > > java.io.IOException: Comparator class
>> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue$RawBytesComparator
>> > > > > is not instantiable
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.FixedFileTrailer.
>> > > createComp
>> > > > > arator(FixedFileTrailer.java:628)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.CompoundBloomFilter.<
>> > > init>(
>> > > > > CompoundBloomFilter.java:79)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.BloomFilterFactory.
>> > > createFromMe
>> > > > > ta(BloomFilterFactory.java:104)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileReader.
>> > > loadBlo
>> > > > > omfilter(StoreFileReader.java:479)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStoreFile.open(
>> > > HStoreF
>> > > > > ile.java:425)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStoreFile.
>> > > initReader(H
>> > > > > StoreFile.java:460)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.
>> > > createStoreFileA
>> > > > > ndReader(HStore.java:671)
>> > > > >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.lambda$
>> > > openStore
>> > > > > Files$0(HStore.java:537)
>> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTas
>> k.run(FutureTask.java:266)
>> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
>> > > call(Executor
>> > > > > s.java:511)
>> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTas
>> k.run(FutureTask.java:266)
>> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
>> > > ThreadPool
>> > > > > Executor.java:1149)
>> > > > >         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
>> > > ThreadPoo
>> > > > > lExecutor.java:624)
>> > > > >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>> > > > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > * Some of the replication UTs failed with message "peer doesn't
>> > exist"
>> > > in
>> > > > > the log
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [ERROR] Errors:
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testAddPeerWithState:171 »
>> > > > RetriesExhausted
>> > > > > Failed after ...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testAppendPeerTableCFs:273 »
>> > > > > RetriesExhausted Failed afte...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testEnableDisable:247 »
>> > > RetriesExhausted
>> > > > > Failed after att...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testPeerBandwidth:763 »
>> > > RetriesExhausted
>> > > > > Failed after att...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testPeerClusterKey:779 »
>> > > RetriesExhausted
>> > > > > Failed after at...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testPeerConfig:192 »
>> RetriesExhausted
>> > > > > Failed
>> > > > > after attemp...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testPeerConfigConflict:656 »
>> > > > > RetriesExhausted Failed afte...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testPeerExcludeNamespaces:515 »
>> > > > > RetriesExhausted Failed a...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testPeerReplicationEndpointImpl:795
>> »
>> > > > > RetriesExhausted Fa...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testSetPeerNamespaces:457 »
>> > > > > RetriesExhausted
>> > > > > Failed after...
>> > > > > [ERROR]   TestReplicationAdmin.testSetReplicateAllUserTables:490
>> »
>> > > > > RetriesExhausted Fail...
>> > > > > [INFO]
>> > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1906, Failures: 0, Errors: 11, Skipped: 21
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-2 is up at
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
>> > > beta-2.RC0/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > orgapachehbase-1199
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-2RC0.2 at
>> > > > > > 9e9b347d667e1fc6165c9f8ae5ae7052147e8895
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is a not-for-production preview of
>> hbase-2.0.0.
>> > It
>> > > > is
>> > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we
>> > > messed
>> > > > > up
>> > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling
>> > > > > > actual 2.0.0 release candidates ("GAs").
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is our second beta release. More than 200
>> fixes
>> > > have
>> > > > > > gone in since
>> > > > > > beta-1. Unit tests generallly pass when run against hadoop2 and
>> > > > > hadoop3[5].
>> > > > > > It includes
>> > > > > > all that was in previous alphas and beta (new assignment
>> manager,
>> > > > offheap
>> > > > > > read/write
>> > > > > > path, in-memory compactions, etc).The list of features
>> addressed in
>> > > > 2.0.0
>> > > > > > so far can be
>> > > > > > found here [3]. There are thousands. The list of ~3k+ fixes in
>> > 2.0.0
>> > > > > > exclusively can be
>> > > > > > found here [4]. Our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 is at
>> [6].
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > This beta was supposed to have as its focus rolling upgrade from
>> > > > > hbase-1.x
>> > > > > > versions but
>> > > > > > this is work not complete (At this late stage, it is looking
>> like
>> > it
>> > > > will
>> > > > > > be a post-2.0.0 project).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > This is our last hbase-2.0.0 beta release. Next up, we'll be
>> > rolling
>> > > an
>> > > > > > actual 2.0.0 release
>> > > > > > candidate. Look for this in a week or two after beta-2 goes out,
>> > > after
>> > > > > > we've done more
>> > > > > > testing and documentation (and we fix issues raised by you all
>> > > against
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > beta).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > One known issue, still unaddressed, is that the User API has not
>> > been
>> > > > > > properly filtered
>> > > > > > so it shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content
>> > > > (HBASE-19663,
>> > > > > > to be fixed
>> > > > > > by release).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok
>> to
>> > put
>> > > > out
>> > > > > > this RC as our second
>> > > > > > beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the VOTE be
>> open
>> > > for
>> > > > at
>> > > > > > least 72 hours
>> > > > > > (Lets say Wednesday morning, March 7th).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93
>> D2
>> > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
>> > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
>> > > > > > 5. https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/
>> > > > > > <https://goo.gl/dFFT8b>
>> > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
>> > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to