Ya looking at the logs it seems not critical. Also the RawbytesComparator is no longer serialized and we don use any comparator for the RawBytesComparator like the RowBloom etc.
Regards Ram On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > > We have it as an explicit dependency in our top-level pom. Doing > > dependency:tree, hadoop minicluster needs it? Its need to run tests? You > > think we should not include in our binary sir? > IIRC, those test jars are not in binary.tag before. HBASE-19089 add > hbase-testing-util module to the assembly so the test jars are packaged to > binary.tar. I'm fine with them. > > On 2018/03/05 19:40:30, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) with some questions > > > unit test (oracle jdk-8u161) - all pass > > > deploy binary (3 nodes) - ok > > > browse master/regionserver web - LGTM > > > put/delete/get/scan 500W rows - ok > > > create/disable/drop/put/scan/count by shell - ok > > > > > > Q1: > > > the 2.0 binary get fatter than 1.4. (384 MB -> 887MB). Seems we package > > > the test docs and source code to binary tar. Are all of them necessary? > > > > > > > > No. Let me review. > > > > > > > > > Q2: > > > Why some test jars of hadoop are included to hbase/lib? such as > > > hadoop-common-2.7.4-tests and hadoop-hdfs-2.7.4-tests > > > > > > > > We have it as an explicit dependency in our top-level pom. Doing > > dependency:tree, hadoop minicluster needs it? Its need to run tests? You > > think we should not include in our binary sir? > > > > [INFO] +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-minicluster:jar:2.7.4:test > > [INFO] | +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:test-jar:tests:2.7.4:test > > > > > > Thanks for trying the RC Chia-Ping, > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2018/03/02 23:40:53, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-2 is up at > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0- > beta-2.RC0/ > > > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachehbase-1199 > > > > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > > > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-2RC0.2 at > > > > 9e9b347d667e1fc6165c9f8ae5ae7052147e8895 > > > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. > It is > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we > messed > > > up > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling > > > > actual 2.0.0 release candidates ("GAs"). > > > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is our second beta release. More than 200 fixes > have > > > > gone in since > > > > beta-1. Unit tests generallly pass when run against hadoop2 and > > > hadoop3[5]. > > > > It includes > > > > all that was in previous alphas and beta (new assignment manager, > offheap > > > > read/write > > > > path, in-memory compactions, etc).The list of features addressed in > 2.0.0 > > > > so far can be > > > > found here [3]. There are thousands. The list of ~3k+ fixes in 2.0.0 > > > > exclusively can be > > > > found here [4]. Our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 is at [6]. > > > > > > > > This beta was supposed to have as its focus rolling upgrade from > > > hbase-1.x > > > > versions but > > > > this is work not complete (At this late stage, it is looking like it > will > > > > be a post-2.0.0 project). > > > > > > > > This is our last hbase-2.0.0 beta release. Next up, we'll be rolling > an > > > > actual 2.0.0 release > > > > candidate. Look for this in a week or two after beta-2 goes out, > after > > > > we've done more > > > > testing and documentation (and we fix issues raised by you all > against > > > this > > > > beta). > > > > > > > > One known issue, still unaddressed, is that the User API has not been > > > > properly filtered > > > > so it shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content > (HBASE-19663, > > > > to be fixed > > > > by release). > > > > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to > put out > > > > this RC as our second > > > > beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the VOTE be open > for at > > > > least 72 hours > > > > (Lets say Wednesday morning, March 7th). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > > > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > > > > 5. https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/ > > > > <https://goo.gl/dFFT8b> > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ > > > > > > > > > >
