+0, I didn't have enough time on this RC to run a more complete suite of tests like I was hoping for.
sign/sums ok SHOULD NOT supply a MD5 checksum file (because MD5 is too broken). [1] compile src 8u151 ok compile src 8u151 w/ error-prone NOT OK - HBASE-19987 [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-2 is up at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-2.RC0/ > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1199 > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1] > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-2RC0.2 at > 9e9b347d667e1fc6165c9f8ae5ae7052147e8895 > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed up > on anything ahead of our rolling > actual 2.0.0 release candidates ("GAs"). > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is our second beta release. More than 200 fixes have > gone in since > beta-1. Unit tests generallly pass when run against hadoop2 and hadoop3[5]. > It includes > all that was in previous alphas and beta (new assignment manager, offheap > read/write > path, in-memory compactions, etc).The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 > so far can be > found here [3]. There are thousands. The list of ~3k+ fixes in 2.0.0 > exclusively can be > found here [4]. Our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 is at [6]. > > This beta was supposed to have as its focus rolling upgrade from hbase-1.x > versions but > this is work not complete (At this late stage, it is looking like it will > be a post-2.0.0 project). > > This is our last hbase-2.0.0 beta release. Next up, we'll be rolling an > actual 2.0.0 release > candidate. Look for this in a week or two after beta-2 goes out, after > we've done more > testing and documentation (and we fix issues raised by you all against this > beta). > > One known issue, still unaddressed, is that the User API has not been > properly filtered > so it shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, > to be fixed > by release). > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out > this RC as our second > beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the VOTE be open for at > least 72 hours > (Lets say Wednesday morning, March 7th). > > Thanks, > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > 5. https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/ > <https://goo.gl/dFFT8b> > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ >
