+0, I didn't have enough time on this RC to run a more complete suite of
tests like I was hoping for.

sign/sums ok
SHOULD NOT supply a MD5 checksum file (because MD5 is too broken). [1]

compile src 8u151 ok
compile src 8u151 w/ error-prone NOT OK - HBASE-19987

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-2 is up at
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-2.RC0/
> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1199
> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-2RC0.2 at
> 9e9b347d667e1fc6165c9f8ae5ae7052147e8895
> hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is
> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed up
> on anything ahead of our rolling
> actual 2.0.0 release candidates ("GAs").
> hbase-2.0.0-beta-2 is our second beta release. More than 200 fixes have
> gone in since
> beta-1. Unit tests generallly pass when run against hadoop2 and hadoop3[5].
> It includes
> all that was in previous alphas and beta (new assignment manager, offheap
> read/write
> path, in-memory compactions, etc).The list of features addressed in 2.0.0
> so far can be
> found here [3]. There are thousands. The list of ~3k+ fixes in 2.0.0
> exclusively can be
> found here [4]. Our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 is at [6].
> This beta was supposed to have as its focus rolling upgrade from hbase-1.x
> versions but
> this is work not complete (At this late stage, it is looking like it will
> be a post-2.0.0 project).
> This is our last hbase-2.0.0 beta release. Next up, we'll be rolling an
> actual 2.0.0 release
> candidate. Look for this in a week or two after beta-2 goes out, after
> we've done more
> testing and documentation (and we fix issues raised by you all against this
> beta).
> One known issue, still unaddressed, is that the User API has not been
> properly filtered
> so it shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663,
> to be fixed
> by release).
> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out
> this RC as our second
> beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the VOTE be open for at
> least 72 hours
> (Lets say Wednesday morning, March 7th).
> Thanks,
> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> 5. https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/
> <https://goo.gl/dFFT8b>
> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/

Reply via email to