-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Achim,
I think misunderstood the problem with the pom - thought it was related to the "root" source repository location as indicated by the project info on the homepage. Apologies for my hasty conclusions. In any case, I think we all agree that the site should be updated and I understand fully if time prevents this . And as far as committers go, I guess James is only one still active? On a different note - looks like the site doesn't work entirely correct on IE (at least for me, the left nav is not visible in IE - firefox works fine) - do you mind if I make one or two changes to the hivemind site project to correct this? Would you want another JIRA for this to keep track? And lastly, was also hoping to incorpororate the Maven Hivemind plugins previously mentioned - module verification and hivedoc. Thoughts? Cheers, Johan Achim Hügen wrote: > Johan, the bug refered to the HiveMind 2 poms and I fixed it. > Nevertheless it would be nice if someone could apply the patches > to the 1.2 site and release it. > Unfortunately my time is limited and I focus on version 2.0 in the moment. > > Anybody else? > > Achim > > Am Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:17:01 +0200 schrieb Johan Lindquist > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi All, > > Over the weekend there was a JIRA opened for the SVN links on the > HiveMind site. Looks like the current project info (as generated by > Maven) uses the site scm URL (someone correct me if I am wrong)? > > Now, to make sure that users don't get confused can I suggest we try to > get the updated site up for Hivemind? The patch already supplied will > provide the new look and feel and other updates that the maven build > brings. The 2.0 site should of course still be there but I guess it > depends somewhat on how complete the documentation is - Achim? If > there is some work required to complete it, anything someone else can > pick up? > > In any case, we should try to clean up the site and make sure links > (such as the SCM) works correctly. > > Only my two cents worth, but we don't want to confuse the users further > by having the (so far very good) documentation fall apart on us. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > > Johan > - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGEgVg1Tv8wj7aQ34RAqa4AJ0SABgGxRIUSAR9pNGwsazwRZASXQCcCX0B ckuI7BycEzEAz8x+2zuGlhM= =Mgal -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
