Your changes are very welcome.
Please use JIRA for submitting the patches.
Maybe the IE bug has already been fixed on the tapestry site
where I copied the styles from.
Could you give me a short update on the plugin subject?
Did you create the plugins or who is the owner?
Achim
Am Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:42:24 +0200 schrieb Johan Lindquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Achim,
I think misunderstood the problem with the pom - thought it was related
to the "root" source repository location as indicated by the project
info on the homepage. Apologies for my hasty conclusions.
In any case, I think we all agree that the site should be updated and I
understand fully if time prevents this . And as far as committers go, I
guess James is only one still active?
On a different note - looks like the site doesn't work entirely correct
on IE (at least for me, the left nav is not visible in IE - firefox
works fine) - do you mind if I make one or two changes to the hivemind
site project to correct this? Would you want another JIRA for this to
keep track?
And lastly, was also hoping to incorpororate the Maven Hivemind plugins
previously mentioned - module verification and hivedoc. Thoughts?
Cheers,
Johan
Achim Hügen wrote:
Johan, the bug refered to the HiveMind 2 poms and I fixed it.
Nevertheless it would be nice if someone could apply the patches
to the 1.2 site and release it.
Unfortunately my time is limited and I focus on version 2.0 in the
moment.
Anybody else?
Achim
Am Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:17:01 +0200 schrieb Johan Lindquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi All,
Over the weekend there was a JIRA opened for the SVN links on the
HiveMind site. Looks like the current project info (as generated by
Maven) uses the site scm URL (someone correct me if I am wrong)?
Now, to make sure that users don't get confused can I suggest we try to
get the updated site up for Hivemind? The patch already supplied will
provide the new look and feel and other updates that the maven build
brings. The 2.0 site should of course still be there but I guess it
depends somewhat on how complete the documentation is - Achim? If
there is some work required to complete it, anything someone else can
pick up?
In any case, we should try to clean up the site and make sure links
(such as the SCM) works correctly.
Only my two cents worth, but we don't want to confuse the users further
by having the (so far very good) documentation fall apart on us.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Johan
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGEgVg1Tv8wj7aQ34RAqa4AJ0SABgGxRIUSAR9pNGwsazwRZASXQCcCX0B
ckuI7BycEzEAz8x+2zuGlhM=
=Mgal
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
