Hi Johan, I think, I used the Apache License - so no problem here.
However, I have to blushingly admit, that the hivedoc plugin is quite a quick hack. So don't expect any clean abstraction from the xml-Registry-Definition. On the positive side, the code is short and straightforward, so it shouldn't be really difficult to pull apart the xml-parsing and the output-generation. Unfortunately, I've not yet had the time to look into the new API. Basically, one probably needs to search the source-files for HiveMind-2.0 annotations. This annotation-parsing thing should be common for validator and hivedoc mojos. The simplest thing might be to generate the good old xml-registry as a temporary file from the annotations and use it as input for both tools. Marcus > -----Original Message----- > From: Johan Lindquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: HiveMind Site > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > For the verifier mojo, there are no issues - not sure about > the HiveDoc one - Marcus? > > And yes, HiveMind 2.0 integration should be considered. > verifier should definately be possibly to re-use for XML > descriptors but it needs to be retrofitted to handle > annotated registries. For HiveDoc, I would assume the same > thing applies? > > Johan > > Achim Hügen wrote: > > It would be great to add that plugin to the hivemind subversion > > repository as an additional module. > > Does any licensing issues or copyright speak against it? > > > > BTW, we will have to check how such plugins can be > integrated with the > > HiveMind 2 registry definition API. > > > > Achim > > > > Am Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:09:17 +0200 schrieb Johan Lindquist > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > Ok, I will take a look - and file the JIRA. > > > > About the plugin - basically there are two mojos that were > mentioned > > on the list - a hivedoc report plugin (written by Marcus > Schulte) and > > a hivemodule.xml verifier plugin (started by myself). The thoughts > > were to create one single hivemind plugin with these two > sub-goals (if > > that is the correct wording). Then of course, any other sub-goals > > that come along would slot in quite nicely as well. Makes sense? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Johan > > > > Achim Hügen wrote: > >>>> Your changes are very welcome. > >>>> Please use JIRA for submitting the patches. > >>>> Maybe the IE bug has already been fixed on the tapestry > site where > >>>> I copied the styles from. > >>>> > >>>> Could you give me a short update on the plugin subject? > >>>> Did you create the plugins or who is the owner? > >>>> > >>>> Achim > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Am Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:42:24 +0200 schrieb Johan Lindquist > >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Achim, > >>>> > >>>> I think misunderstood the problem with the pom - thought it was > >>>> related to the "root" source repository location as indicated by > >>>> the project info on the homepage. Apologies for my > hasty conclusions. > >>>> > >>>> In any case, I think we all agree that the site should > be updated > >>>> and I understand fully if time prevents this . And as far as > >>>> committers go, I guess James is only one still active? > >>>> > >>>> On a different note - looks like the site doesn't work entirely > >>>> correct on IE (at least for me, the left nav is not > visible in IE - > >>>> firefox works fine) - do you mind if I make one or two > changes to > >>>> the hivemind site project to correct this? Would you > want another > >>>> JIRA for this to keep track? > >>>> > >>>> And lastly, was also hoping to incorpororate the Maven Hivemind > >>>> plugins previously mentioned - module verification and > hivedoc. Thoughts? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> > >>>> Johan > >>>> > >>>> Achim Hügen wrote: > >>>>>>> Johan, the bug refered to the HiveMind 2 poms and I fixed it. > >>>>>>> Nevertheless it would be nice if someone could apply > the patches > >>>>>>> to the 1.2 site and release it. > >>>>>>> Unfortunately my time is limited and I focus on > version 2.0 in > >>>>>>> the moment. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Anybody else? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Achim > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:17:01 +0200 schrieb Johan Lindquist > >>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Over the weekend there was a JIRA opened for the SVN links on > >>>>>>> the HiveMind site. Looks like the current project info (as > >>>>>>> generated by > >>>>>>> Maven) uses the site scm URL (someone correct me if I > am wrong)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now, to make sure that users don't get confused can I > suggest we > >>>>>>> try to get the updated site up for Hivemind? The > patch already > >>>>>>> supplied will provide the new look and feel and other updates > >>>>>>> that the maven build brings. The 2.0 site should of course > >>>>>>> still be there but I guess it > >>>>>>> depends somewhat on how complete the documentation is > - Achim? If > >>>>>>> there is some work required to complete it, anything someone > >>>>>>> else can pick up? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In any case, we should try to clean up the site and make sure > >>>>>>> links (such as the SCM) works correctly. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Only my two cents worth, but we don't want to confuse > the users > >>>>>>> further by having the (so far very good) documentation fall > >>>>>>> apart on us. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Johan > >>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > - -- > you too? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGGzbz1Tv8wj7aQ34RAp4iAJ9PpmaxZZdTZG3F/xFC1f9U92xO/ACeN2YR > mj/JzfMNeUYruPhBqbK4BYA= > =mhaO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
