Justin Erenkrantz wrote: [...] >Actually, I think the conditional should be: > >while (p <= he) > >Thoughts? We're scanning R->L, so p points to the end of the string. >It is possible to have "<!--#" as n (which should match). -- justin > I think (p < he) is still the right conditional; 'he' points to the address right after the end of the string to be scanned (because of the initialization he = h + hl). --Brian
- [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... john sachs
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Ian Holsman
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Brian Pane
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Ian Holsman
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Brian Pane
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Brian Pane
- [PATCH] mod_include fix Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Ian Holsman
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch... Ryan Bloom