Re: [PATCH] Take 3 of mod_include patch...

[Cliff Woolley]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:

> > Hmm... I'd have thought that was the whole point of the map_to_storage
> > hook, if its name were any indication...  <shrug>
>
> It is, but if I am just putting together a quick module, to solve a
> problem and it generates the page itself, all I should have to do, is
> create a handler, like I did in 1.3.  If I also have to create a
> map_to_storage hook, then we will have broken a lot of 1.3 modules
> when they try to port, and I can't see a good reason for that.
>
> The map_to_storage hook should be an optimization that I want to use,
> not a requirement that I HAVE to use.

Ahh, yes, well that makes sense.  I agree.

--Cliff

--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Charlottesville, VA