From: "Ian Holsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:36 AM
> On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 08:12, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > The map_to_storage hook should be an optimization that I want to use, not
> > a requirement that I HAVE to use.
> >
>
> you don't need to use it. look at mod-status/mod-info
> both requests aren't handled by the serving a file from the file-system.
> they >could< write a map-to-storage hook which would return 'OK' if the
> handler is status/info.
> but at the moment they don't and they let it go through to the default
> map_to_storage hook implementations, directory_walk and file_walk.
You read this rightly.
> I'm not seeing why a module developer would need to care about
> map_to_storage unless they want serve the file from say proxy,
> or a oracle DB for instance.
Performance :)
