On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:53:47PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > Why is calling it proc_pthread silly? We are talking about a pthread based > process lock. Personally, I think Apache 1.3 should be changed, especially > since it hasn't been released yet. My concern is that calling it a pthread lock > makes it sound like we are just locking threads. Fine, change one or the other. Having it inconsistent is *silly*. Personally, I think Apache 1.3's pthread makes more sense given the context. -- justin
- [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Jim Jagielski
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Standardize AcceptMutex config Aaron Bannert
