On Wednesday 19 September 2001 08:56 pm, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:53:47PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > Why is calling it proc_pthread silly? We are talking about a pthread
> > > based process lock. Personally, I think Apache 1.3 should be changed,
> > > especially since it hasn't been released yet. My concern is that
> > > calling it a pthread lock makes it sound like we are just locking
> > > threads.
> >
> > Fine, change one or the other. Having it inconsistent is *silly*.
> > Personally, I think Apache 1.3's pthread makes more sense given the
> > context. -- justin
>
> I agree with Justin.
That's fine, could you please explain why? I am trying to understand this
POV. Why don't you think that calling out the proc part is important?
I don't mind being wrong, but I do mind not knowing why I am wrong. :-)
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
