On Wednesday 19 September 2001 07:56 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:53:47PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Why is calling it proc_pthread silly? We are talking about a pthread
> > based process lock. Personally, I think Apache 1.3 should be changed,
> > especially since it hasn't been released yet. My concern is that calling
> > it a pthread lock makes it sound like we are just locking threads.
>
> Fine, change one or the other. Having it inconsistent is *silly*.
> Personally, I think Apache 1.3's pthread makes more sense given the
> context. -- justin
I agree that having them inconsistent is incredibly silly. I am wondering
why you think the 1.3 one makes more sense. I have told you why I think
calling out that it is a process makes more sense to me. I am trying to
understand your point of view.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
