On Thursday 20 September 2001 05:26 am, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Okay, with three people against me, I stand corrected. Please, let's change
the 2.0 version to just pthread. :-)
Ryan
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Why is calling it proc_pthread silly? We are talking about a pthread
> > based process lock. Personally, I think Apache 1.3 should be changed,
> > especially since it hasn't been released yet. My concern is that calling
> > it a pthread lock makes it sound like we are just locking threads.
>
> I think calling it proc_pthread under 1.3 is pretty silly actually.
> Unless we call all the others proc_flock, etc.. We're talking about
> how we mutex the accept, and we're using pthread locking for that.
> When we say 'sysvsem' we're not lockings semaphores :)
--
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
