--On Friday, August 13, 2004 10:02 AM -0700 "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        I was wondering if there's any potential harm in increasing the
LimitRequestFieldsize from it's current value of 8k to something more
(like 32k).

Instances that need to support larger header sizes can set the directive, so I don't know why we should make the default larger. Is there a compelling reason to do so? -- justin

Reply via email to