* "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : It might make sense to increase the compile-time default
> : while retaining 8k as the config-file default. (But this
> : would probably require changing the name of the constant to
> : avoid confusing people.)
>
> It's precisely what I was planning to do. Has somebody tried something
> like that (I mean: do you see any security issues around it) ?
Actually, I see no sense in restricting at compile time at all. As far as I
can see, we can just take the 8k config default and drop the upper compile
time limit.
nd
--
Wenn nur Ingenieure mit Diplom programmieren w�rden, h�tten wir
wahrscheinlich weniger schlechte Software.
Wir h�tten allerdings auch weniger gute Software.
-- Felix von Leitner in dasr
