On 10/06/2005 02:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> This is actually on my ToLookAt list... The issue is
> the confusion on what defines a member *name*. Is it
> just the scheme+hostname or is it the complete
> URL. I consider it the later.

That was also my feeling after I took a look to the code.

> 
> I have some ideas on how to better address this...
> 

I guess you let us know your ideas :-).

[..cut..]

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to