William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Issac Goldstand wrote: >> I'd agree if mod_ssl is disabled by default, but if it is, why are they >> downloading the mod_ssl-enabled installer? > > You miss the point, it's illegal in some jurisdictions to possess/use > such cryptography. That installer will remain as a service to those > communities, nothing more.
I understand that. I assumed in this statement that there'd 2 installers - an SSL-msi and a non-SSL msi. Based on that, it'd be pointless to disable SSL by default in the SSL-enabled package (otherwise, you'd download the other one).
