Hi, > I'll take this as a resounding no, and that the draft package is > sufficient. Moving it within 24 hrs unless I hear a specific > technical objection. I've heard from a couple of users that they prefer *.zip archives rather than the *.msi files; and hacked a WSH script to fix the config files when using a zip distribution. So I think it would be great to disribute a *.zip archive too in addition to the *.msi.
Regarding certificate creation I've hacked another simple WSH script a while ago, and got some positive feedback; however currently its not perfect yet since I had not the time to fully go trough all openssl settings; I use currently this: openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 999 -subj "/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/C=US/ST=Oregon/L=Portland/O=Example Organisation/OU=IT Unit/CN=www.example.com" -newkey rsa:1024 -keyout server.key -out server.crt these certs are accepted by Apache and enable SSL access - however I get warnings in the error log: [Wed Mar 21 02:11:55 2007] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?) hints welcome! If someone wants to play with the WSH script you can find it here: http://www.gknw.net/vb/scripts/MkCerts.vbs Although I'm not a big WSH fan - I think it makes sense on Win32 since its almost there, and the user doesnt need to install / download another tool just to fix confs or create certs. Guenter.