On 7/16/2010 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 7/16/2010 6:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> We may as well leave it at "erroronstatus" I agree with Eric on >> keeping your original choice and worrying about the doc. > > Can we drop the word error, since it has four potential meanings? > > backendfailureonstatus perhaps, or something along those lines?
Hold up; see http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html fail_on_status - why would we invent new phrases?
