On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/16/2010 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 7/16/2010 6:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> >>> We may as well leave it at "erroronstatus" I agree with Eric on >>> keeping your original choice and worrying about the doc. >> >> Can we drop the word error, since it has four potential meanings? >> >> backendfailureonstatus perhaps, or something along those lines? > > Hold up; see http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html > fail_on_status - why would we invent new phrases?
good catch
