On 7/12/2010 2:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:48 PM,<[email protected]> wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Thu Apr 1 22:48:38 2010
New Revision: 930125
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930125&view=rev
Log:
Proxy balancer: support setting error status according to
HTTP response code from a backend.
PR 48939 [Daniel Ruggeri<DRuggeri primary.net>]
+ else if (!strcasecmp(key, "erroronstatus")) {
Any opinions on "erroronstatus"? It doesn't feel quite right to me,
but I'm not confident about a replacement.
Just plain "errorstatus" or "errorstatuscodes"?
If normal response handling takes the same action on other status
codes (I dunno), maybe "extraerrorstatus" or "extraerrorstatuscodes"
would be bettter?
proxyseterror?
If erroronstatus is right out, I like errorstatuscodes best as a
replacement.
Jeff;
I will gladly take the tasks you mentioned in STATUS as soon as we
have consensus on the name of the directive. It may be a lofty goal but
it would be great if this could make it into 2.2.16.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
