On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 7/16/2010 10:37 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 7/16/2010 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2010 6:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We may as well leave it at "erroronstatus"  I agree with Eric on
>>>>> keeping your original choice and worrying about the doc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Can we drop the word error, since it has four potential meanings?
>>>>
>>>> backendfailureonstatus perhaps, or something along those lines?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hold up; see
>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
>>> fail_on_status - why would we invent new phrases?
>>>
>>>
>> good catch
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Sounds like this would be the best name. As promised, here is the final
> patch including doc, the name "failonstatus", and updates made in trunk for
> this patch. Also included is an update to trunk for the new name and doc.
>

Thanks; I added one tweak to the patch -- an "s" at the end of "code" in the
following line:

+                return "erroronstatus must be one or more HTTP response code";
+            }



>
> For ease of reading, the doc patch reads thusly:
>        A single or comma-separated list of HTTP status codes. If set this
> will
>        force the worker into error state when the backend returns any
> status code
>        in the list. Worker recovery behaves the same as other worker
> errors.
>
> Finally, here is my proposed change to STATUS to indicate completion of
> Jeff's suggestions as well as update the location of the 2.2.x patch:
> --- STATUS      2010-07-20 09:53:36.298789200 -0500
> +++ STATUS.mod  2010-07-20 09:54:15.466286400 -0500
> @@ -145,13 +145,9 @@
>     statuses are found
>     PR: 48939
>     Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930125&view=rev
> -    2.2.x patch:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25153
> +    2.2.x patch:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25788
>

Any chance you can update your 2.2.x patch in Bugzilla to include the
tweaked wording (s/code/codes/)?   Sorry :)


>     Submitted by: Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri primary.net>
>
>     +1: niq, jim
> -    trawick suggests:
> -      1. somebody write doc (Daniel volunteers)
> -      2. somebody create new patch which includes r962972, any
> -          subsequent changes, and doc (Daniel volunteers)
>
>   * mod_disk_cache: Decline the opportunity to cache if the response is
>     a 206 Partial Content. This stops a reverse proxied partial response
>
>
> Thank you, all.
> --
> Daniel Ruggeri
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Reply via email to