On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > On 10/5/2011 4:18 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> True. But a generic apparatus for even more fine-grained log >> configuration won't happen in time for 2.4. > > I have toyed with the idea of this... do you have suggestions on how > this might be implemented? One of the ideas I heard (or thought of - > don't recall) was to implement an error log filter such that messages > matching a certain regex get dropped. To me that seems like it would be > very expensive for busier sites, but would serve the purpose for some of > the user base.
It would be quite expensive to be sure… for some sites, logging is the most expensive part of the server.
