On 10/5/2011 4:18 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > True. But a generic apparatus for even more fine-grained log > configuration won't happen in time for 2.4.
I have toyed with the idea of this... do you have suggestions on how this might be implemented? One of the ideas I heard (or thought of - don't recall) was to implement an error log filter such that messages matching a certain regex get dropped. To me that seems like it would be very expensive for busier sites, but would serve the purpose for some of the user base. > So, if there is consensous to change the messages to "info", I will > commit that after waiting a bit more for possible objections. BTW, > "debug" would be fine for me, too. +1 for info level -- Daniel Ruggeri
