On Tuesday 03/01/2012 at 09:16, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
0On 1/2/2012 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
We should try to get at least the rewrite/proxy issue resolved, first.
About the Windows-onlly issues... Well, if there are not sufficient
developers who have time and inclination to look into those, I would
rather release 2.4.0 as "GA on unix, beta on Windows", than delay it
indefinitely.
When we tag and roll 2.4.0, if it isn't up to snuff, it won't pass the
vote for GA, but perhaps it will pass the vote for beta (or alpha).
I'm not sure where the impetus came from to change the way the HTTP
Project operates at this particular point in time. It certainly
hasn't
been discussed much on this list, or put up for a vote. The
methodology
for handling releases was all hashed out a number of years ago and was
assembled from consensus. Has that consensus changed?
I all for stop any and all API changes other than anything that may
require fixing these.
I am all for RCs if it means changing the -dev is to -rc#
I'm sorry I signed off before I realized SSL with "AcceptFilter httpd
none" was still a problem on Windoze.
Yes, Mario's mod_proxy_balancer/slotmem shm errors I am also still
getting/
Mario, I know you read this list ... chime in your PR#
and any other possitivle showstopper that may be on any platform other
than building ... not that I count :)
Other than these few ... bummers ... guys ... this is one of the best
servers I have seen.
Cheets
Gregg
Second on that, is running great HTTP only.
Gregg, you made a typo "...realized SSL with "AcceptFilter httpd none"
was...", must be "https".
