On 05.08.2013 13:18, Eric Covener wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Thomas Eckert > <thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> One could do an 'OPTIONS *' request. But I am not sure if that is any >>> better than proxy-initial-not-pooled in terms of performance. >> >> I don't see why an OPTIONS request should not encounter problems where a GET >> request will. After all, the problem is on the transport layer, not on the >> application layer. Am I missing something ? > > Could have problems at either level (e.g. MaxKeepalives)
I think what people are trying to say: another request in front of each request might increase the relative frequency (per real request) with which the problem occurs. Regards, Rainer
