On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > > Am 08.12.2015 um 11:44 schrieb Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>: >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Stefan Eissing >>> >>> PS. Re 5: with change 1+4, a TLS upgrade switcher could install an output >>> filter, return and have it being processed normally. The output filter >>> would then send the 101 and do the TLS handshake. Would that work? >> >> The issue is that this output filter would have to both read and write >> during the TLS handshake, not sure this is suitable. > > Ok, maybe from pre_read_request hook then?
Hmm, pre_read of the second request, interesting. But maybe output filter could work too after all, we'd need to set the correct CONN_SENSE for event to do right thing? pre_read may be simpler though, based on a flag in the conn_rec?
