> Am 19.01.2017 um 22:38 schrieb Yann Ylavic <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: icing >> Date: Thu Jan 19 21:09:18 2017 >> New Revision: 1779528 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779528&view=rev >> Log: >> On the trunk: >> >> reverting change 1779525. > > We really need to not destroy m->pool in its parent's cleanup.
Hmm, why is that bad? > How about something like the attached instead, worth (other-)Stefan a try no? > That's temporary, we probably could avoid that with a flag (re)set in > a cleanup of mplx->pool itself... > <h2_mplx_destroy.patch> Would work. But then we could just never destroy this directly, because it will always disappear via the parent h2_session pool? Stefan Eissing <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenstrasse 16 48155 Münster www.greenbytes.de
