I can see that a flat directive namespace has its drawbacks... ;-)
> Am 01.04.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net>:
>
>
> On 4/1/2017 11:18 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>>> I went with the directive name
>>> RemoteIPProxyProtocolDisableHosts to align more with the fact that a
>>> single host or range can be disabled.
>> How about RemoteIPProxyProtocolExceptions since one can configure
>> either an IP or a network?
>> Host looks a bit ambiguous to me, especially with HTTP...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yann.
>
> Oh, yeah, I like that even better. I'll stage this up and will commit in
> a day or two unless we have some better suggestions.
>
> --
> Daniel Ruggeri
>
