On 11/7/2017 8:30 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> If you are thinking of n.n.n-alphan format, how is that going to be mapped
> within ap_release.h? Version numbers are cheap, so cycling n.n.n-alpha
> to n.n.n+1-alpha hasn't proven to be an issue.

+1

Will do that. In context of conversation alpha1, alpha2, etc just meant
x.y.z+1-alpha since it was much easier to type that than all the dots on
my tiny little on-screen mobile keyboard 

-- Daniel Ruggeri

Reply via email to