On 11/7/2017 8:30 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > If you are thinking of n.n.n-alphan format, how is that going to be mapped > within ap_release.h? Version numbers are cheap, so cycling n.n.n-alpha > to n.n.n+1-alpha hasn't proven to be an issue.
+1 Will do that. In context of conversation alpha1, alpha2, etc just meant x.y.z+1-alpha since it was much easier to type that than all the dots on my tiny little on-screen mobile keyboard -- Daniel Ruggeri
