I understand it it may seem silly to discuss this or that name I think
it will be of great benefit to find a good name in the long run, to
make it easy to recognize and/or user support.
2017-12-05 15:06 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>:
>> Am 05.12.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com>:
>> Maybe ManagedDomain and <ManagedDomainDefine>, as iiuc we are going to use
>> for SSLPolicy?
>> 2017-12-05 14:47 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>:
>> Totally agree with you. If you make a better proposal that avoids existing
>> overlaps, I might just pick it up.
>> > Am 05.12.2017 um 14:40 schrieb Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi Stefan,
>> > 2017-12-04 14:16 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>:
>> > Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep
>> > '<ManagedDomain' as is.
>> > I propose the following changes:
>> > 1. The simple, single line 'ManagedDomain' will be renamed to 'MDGroup'
>> > I personally find the renaming a bit confusing, since visually there is no
>> > affinity between <ManagedDomain> and MDGroup, but I liked the previous
>> > naming so I might be biased. If the majority thinks this is the way to go
>> > I am fine with it, just wanted to express my opinion :)
>> > Luca
email dferradal at gmail.com