On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > Personally, I think it is bad form to hold off on a back port > for a feature that only 1 person really, really "demanded" > and then not do anything to add that functionality in. > > So I say YES, we SHOULD vote on this as-is and stop > hamstringing efforts to add this functionality to 2.4.x
Or, it is bad form to introduce features and then force some config-changes on users after the 'experimental' phase, which isn't even proposed, in this case. We want to be pretty strict about config changes, and the suggested white > black list behavior based on the core enable directive would cause 2.4.x "maintenance" users (using that term very loosely) to potentially change their config, which I consider rude. But not everyone here has to agree with me /shrug
