On 13 Dec 2017, at 2:22 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:

> Or, it is bad form to introduce features and then force some
> config-changes on users after the 'experimental' phase, which
> isn't even proposed, in this case.
> We want to be pretty strict about config changes, and the
> suggested white > black list behavior based on the core
> enable directive would cause 2.4.x "maintenance" users
> (using that term very loosely) to potentially change their
> config, which I consider rude. But not everyone here has
> to agree with me /shrug

Are you suggesting we hold off until you had a chance to put together a patch 
to fix this?

If so, please update STATUS to stay so.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to