On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
> So I think neither truncating nor increasing the field size is backportable.

What could possibly be considered backportable is adding a new
"fullname" field (char[256]) at the end of proxy_worker_shared.
That would be 2.4.x only, while we can (and should) rearrange
proxy_worker_shared in trunk.


Reply via email to