On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > So I think neither truncating nor increasing the field size is backportable.
What could possibly be considered backportable is adding a new "fullname" field (char[256]) at the end of proxy_worker_shared. That would be 2.4.x only, while we can (and should) rearrange proxy_worker_shared in trunk. Regards, Yann.
