On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* > confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least > structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releases of > source are one of the few things the version control time machine cannot undo > (and are sacred things to the ASF as well), I want to be sure of the > procedure. Maybe instead of doing the RM job, I could talk you into putting > the (presumably less) volunteer time to vetting out the previous work so we > can add to the number of folks willing and comfortable being RM?
I think it would be easier for someone to check your work on the 30th 2.4.x release ather than a first 2.5/2.6 release. Also, more normal testers. Just my 2c. > Side note, the slotmem fix seems like a showstopper, right? I'd want to see > that in before a T&R. +1
