> On Feb 15, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: >> As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* >> confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least >> structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releases of >> source are one of the few things the version control time machine cannot >> undo (and are sacred things to the ASF as well), I want to be sure of the >> procedure. Maybe instead of doing the RM job, I could talk you into putting >> the (presumably less) volunteer time to vetting out the previous work so we >> can add to the number of folks willing and comfortable being RM? > > I think it would be easier for someone to check your work on the 30th > 2.4.x release ather than a first 2.5/2.6 release. Also, more normal > testers. Just my 2c. >
+1
