On 2018/02/15 13:49:01, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > > As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* > > confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least > > structurally correct and matches project expectations. Since releases of > > source are one of the few things the version control time machine cannot > > undo (and are sacred things to the ASF as well), I want to be sure of the > > procedure. Maybe instead of doing the RM job, I could talk you into putting > > the (presumably less) volunteer time to vetting out the previous work so we > > can add to the number of folks willing and comfortable being RM? > > I think it would be easier for someone to check your work on the 30th > 2.4.x release ather than a first 2.5/2.6 release. Also, more normal > testers. Just my 2c. >
Well... When you say it like that it makes perfect sense, hahaha I will proceed on Monday with T&R and call for vote.
